Following the striking of a statement of claim alleging conspiracy, defamation, misfeasance in public office, and related torts against numerous defendants, the court determined the quantum of costs payable on the successful pleadings motion.
Multiple defendant groups sought more than $205,000 in partial indemnity fees and over $20,000 in disbursements.
Applying Rule 57.01 of the Rules of Civil Procedure and the fairness principles articulated in Boucher, the court considered duplication of effort among separately represented defendants with similar interests.
The court concluded that substantial overlap existed between certain defendants’ legal work and therefore limited recovery to a single set of costs for those parties.
Reduced costs totalling $108,000 in fees plus $10,560 in disbursements were awarded, subject to HST.