Mario Tremblay

The appellant appealed his convictions for robbery and being disguised with intent to commit an indictable offence, challenging the eyewitness identification.

The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the majority of the Quebec Court of Appeal that the trial judge made no palpable or overriding error.

The appellant appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada to quash his guilty pleas, arguing they resulted from the undue influence of his counsel.

The Court allowed the appeal, adopting the dissenting reasons of Bisson J.A. in the Court of Appeal, and quashed the guilty pleas.

The accused was convicted of sexual assault at trial but acquitted on appeal by the Quebec Court of Appeal.

The Crown appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and restored the conviction for the reasons given by the dissenting judge in the Court of Appeal.