On competing temporary family law motions concerning a 21-month-old child, the court addressed parenting time expansion, supervision, decision-making responsibility, an OCL referral, and child support.
The court rejected renewed allegations justifying supervised parenting time, but found a limited expansion to include one overnight per week was in the child's best interests, while deferring any automatic move to shared parenting.
Ongoing parental conflict, inconsistent routines, and concerns about communications with third parties supported a temporary order granting the mother sole decision-making responsibility with mandatory meaningful consultation and use of a parenting communication application.
The court also ordered a s. 112 OCL investigation and imputed minimum-wage-level income to the father, fixing child support arrears and ongoing monthly support.
