Margaret Mary Barnes

The applicant, convicted of first-degree murder, sought bail pending his conviction appeal.

The Crown opposed the application based on the public interest criterion.

The court applied the three-part test under s. 679(3) of the Criminal Code, requiring the applicant to show the appeal is not frivolous, they will surrender, and detention is not necessary in the public interest.

While the surrender criterion was met, the court found the grounds of appeal weak, particularly the ineffective assistance of counsel claim.

Considering the gravity of the first-degree murder offence, its heinous circumstances (murder-for-hire), and the applicant's dangerousness, the court concluded that the reviewability interest did not outweigh the enforceability interest, and public confidence in the administration of justice would be undermined by release.

The application for bail was dismissed.

The applicant sought a writ of habeas corpus challenging the Correctional Service of Canada's decision to suspend his day parole, alleging procedural unfairness.

The Parole Board of Canada upheld the suspension.

The court dismissed the application, declining jurisdiction based on the "Peiroo exception," which defers to comprehensive statutory review schemes.

The applicant's medical condition was not deemed an exceptional circumstance to bypass this principle.