Following divorce, the parties litigated corollary relief including custody, access, child support, spousal support, and equalization.
The court found the parties had significant credibility issues and incomplete financial disclosure.
Sole custody of the children was granted to the respondent, but the applicant was granted a graduated return to unsupervised access based on evidence from supervised access reports and the principle of maximizing contact under the Divorce Act.
Income was imputed to the applicant based on business bank deposits due to inadequate disclosure, resulting in retroactive and ongoing child support.
Claims for spousal support and equalization were largely denied, with only limited transitional spousal support recognized.