The applicant union sought judicial review of an arbitrator's decision upholding the termination of a union member for just cause.
The employer terminated the grievor after video surveillance showed him removing two rugs from the workplace without authorization.
The arbitrator rejected the grievor's explanation that he had bartered for the rugs with a co-worker, finding him complicit in the theft.
The Divisional Court dismissed the application, holding that the arbitrator's factual findings and credibility assessments were reasonable and amply supported by the record.
