The accused was charged with assault, uttering threats, and criminal harassment against his former intimate partner.
The complainant alleged the offences occurred after she discovered he was married with a child and attempted to end their relationship.
The accused denied the allegations, claiming they were planning to marry and the complainant's family conspired against him.
Applying the W.(D.) principles, the court found the complainant highly credible and rejected the accused's evidence as illogical and internally inconsistent.
The accused was found guilty on all charges.
