The applicant sought temporary exclusive possession of the jointly owned matrimonial home, which also housed a dog boarding business registered as her sole proprietorship.
Following a domestic incident, the applicant was subject to criminal release conditions preventing her attendance at the property, leaving the respondent in possession.
The court granted the motion, finding that the business required centralized management and could not function effectively under divided authority.
The applicant was granted temporary exclusive possession of the home and operational control of the business to preserve the family asset pending trial.
