The appellant appealed his conviction for sexual interference and sought leave to appeal his five-year sentence.
The Court of Appeal bifurcated the sentence appeal to allow the appellant to seek Legal Aid funding.
On the conviction appeal, the appellant argued the trial judge erred in assessing the complainant's credibility and inconsistencies in her testimony.
The Court dismissed the conviction appeal, finding no reviewable error in the trial judge's credibility assessments, which are owed particular deference.
