The Crown applied for certiorari seeking to quash a preliminary inquiry decision discharging the accused on charges of breaching a prohibition order under s. 161 of the Criminal Code and breaching probation under s. 733.1(1).
The preliminary inquiry judge had concluded there was no evidence establishing the mens rea required for the offences and discharged the accused.
On review, the Superior Court considered whether the preliminary inquiry judge committed a jurisdictional error or merely assessed the sufficiency of the evidence.
Applying the principles governing review of committal decisions, the court held that the judge’s determination concerned the sufficiency of the evidence and did not constitute a jurisdictional error.
The certiorari application was therefore dismissed.