The appellant appealed his summary convictions for impaired driving, 'over 80', and dangerous driving.
He argued that the trial judge erred in her findings regarding identity and alleged violations of his rights under sections 8, 9, and 10(b) of the Charter.
The Superior Court of Justice found that the trial judge's findings of fact were supported by the evidence and entitled to deference.
The appeal was dismissed as the appellant failed to demonstrate that the verdicts were unreasonable or the product of a material misapprehension of evidence.