The accused was charged with multiple offences, including assault with a weapon, after pointing an unloaded pellet gun at two pedestrians in downtown Toronto.
The defence argued that the accused lacked the necessary mental intent due to drug-induced psychosis or, in the alternative, was not criminally responsible due to a mental disorder.
The court held that the accused's drug-induced state raised a reasonable doubt regarding the specific intent required for the weapon possession charge, resulting in an acquittal on that count.
However, the court rejected the not criminally responsible defence for the general intent offences because the psychosis was voluntarily self-induced through cannabis use, resulting in convictions on the remaining charges.