The moving party sought leave to appeal from decisions directing that a trial on mobility and residential schedule commence shortly.
After being granted one extension of time to file her materials, the moving party requested a further extension.
The Divisional Court denied the further extension, noting the imminent trial date and lack of evidence supporting the need for an extension.
Based on the detailed notice of motion already filed, the court concluded the proposed appeal did not meet the test for leave to appeal under Rule 62.02 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.
The motion for leave to appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.
