The applicant condominium corporation brought an application alleging that the respondent owner was violating the declaration and rules by allowing clients of her home-based massage therapy business to park in designated visitor parking spaces.
The Tribunal found that the governing documents did not define 'visitor' and that paying business clients reasonably fell within the commonly understood meaning of the term.
The Tribunal also found no evidence that the respondent's clients were violating rules against parking on the common elements roadways.
The application was dismissed.