The applicant builder sought judicial review of a decision by the warranty corporation requiring it to pay $45,688.71 for a retaining wall.
The corporation had initially determined the retaining wall was not a warranted defect, but later reversed its position based on new submissions from the homeowner, without providing the applicant notice or an opportunity to respond.
The Divisional Court allowed the application, finding that the corporation breached procedural fairness.
The impugned finding was quashed and the matter remitted for a fresh decision following a fair process.