The applicant student sought an interlocutory injunction to prevent the respondent college from evicting him from the student residence after his contract expired, following disciplinary sanctions for failing to wear a mask.
The court dismissed the motion, finding that the college's decision to enter into or renew a residence agreement was a private, contractual matter not subject to judicial review, as it did not involve the exercise of a power central to the college's administrative mandate.
Furthermore, the applicant failed to establish irreparable harm, as relocation costs would be compensable in damages and his academic program was being delivered remotely.