The parties were unable to agree on how to list the former matrimonial home for sale and divide the proceeds pursuant to a Final Order.
The applicant argued the respondent breached the order by delaying the listing, causing him to incur additional carrying costs.
The court noted the delay was partly due to the pandemic and the applicant's appeals.
The parties agreed to a compromise on the carrying costs, and the court issued detailed directions for the listing, sale, and disbursement of the proceeds.
