Susan Metzler

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination with respect to goods and services because of race and place of origin, claiming that cigarettes he purchased from the respondent's gas station were poisoned.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant stated he would rely only on his own testimony about his experiences and had no other evidence to support his allegations.

The Tribunal concluded there was no reasonable prospect the applicant could successfully prove the cigarettes were poisoned as alleged and dismissed the application.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination with respect to services because of disability regarding the Law School Admission Test (LSAT).

In this interim decision, the Tribunal addressed the applicant's failure to provide pre-hearing disclosure and his requests for an adjournment, further production, and to amend the application.

The Tribunal denied the adjournment request, finding no exceptional circumstances, and directed the applicant to comply with his disclosure obligations.

The respondent was directed to respond to the production and amendment requests.