The appellant requested a reconsideration of a Licence Appeal Tribunal decision that confirmed the Registrar's order suspending her driver's licence for medical reasons related to a mental health condition.
The appellant argued that the Tribunal acted outside its jurisdiction, made errors of fact and law, and sought to introduce new evidence.
The adjudicator found that the appellant failed to provide evidence of jurisdictional error or procedural unfairness, and was merely attempting to reargue issues already canvassed at the original hearing.
Furthermore, the new evidence submitted could have been obtained prior to the hearing and did not address her ability to drive safely.
The request for reconsideration was dismissed.
