The appellant appealed a motion judge's decision striking his statement of claim and dismissing his action against the Crown and College respondents.
The appellant had asserted claims based in negligence, malice, misfeasance in public office, and Charter breaches relating to the suspension of his OHIP payments.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the motion judge that the pleadings were seriously deficient, failed to disclose a reasonable cause of action, and that certain claims were res judicata.
