The applicants sought leave to appeal to the Divisional Court from an order dismissing their motion for summary judgment in a commercial lease dispute.
The underlying action involved a dispute over a $210,000 payment, which the tenants claimed was a security deposit and the landlord claimed was a commission.
The court dismissed the application for leave to appeal, finding no good reason to doubt the correctness of the motion judge's decision that a trial was necessary to resolve conflicting evidence, and concluding that the matter did not involve issues of public importance.