The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, disputing the respondent's determination that her injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).
The applicant argued that chronic pain, including neck, shoulder, back, and jaw pain, warranted removal from the MIG.
The Tribunal found that the applicant's injuries were predominantly minor soft tissue injuries and that her ongoing pain did not cause functional impairment.
The Tribunal preferred the respondent's physiatry evidence that the applicant's ongoing pain was attributable to her work posture as a dental hygienist rather than the accident.
The application for a $3,175.80 physiotherapy treatment plan and interest was dismissed.