The appellant appealed a site-specific Zoning By-law Amendment and a consent application intended to facilitate the development of a long-term care facility.
Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement and entered into multiple agreements.
The appellant withdrew its appeal against the Zoning By-law Amendment, and the parties jointly recommended a revised condition of consent.
Relying on uncontested land use planning evidence, the Tribunal found the consent satisfied all statutory criteria, allowed the consent appeal in part, and authorized the provisional consent subject to the amended condition.