The appellants appealed a child protection order placing the children in Crown wardship without access.
The court held there was evidence supporting the trial judge’s findings that the children were in need of protection and that one parent posed a substantial risk within the meaning of s. 37(2)(d) of the Child and Family Services Act.
The court further held the children would not be protected from that risk if returned to the appellants, even with supervision by the society.
Finding no error in the reviewing judge’s analysis, the appeal was dismissed without costs.
