Not disclosed

The appellants appealed a trial judgment to the Court of Appeal for Ontario.

The Court dismissed the appeal, finding that the trial judge's reasons were full and comprehensive and that the conclusions were fully supported by the evidence.

The appellant appealed his convictions for sexual assault and his designation as a dangerous offender.

The Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge's admission of similar fact evidence from other complainants.

The Court also found no error in the trial judge's conclusion that the appellant met the criteria for a dangerous offender under section 753 of the Criminal Code, and that a long term offender designation would not adequately protect the public.

The appeals were dismissed.

The Crown appealed a summary conviction appeal judge's decision finding a breach of section 11(b) of the Charter.

The breach was based on the finding that the Crown unreasonably pursued an application to remove defence counsel.

The Court of Appeal held that this finding was open to the summary conviction appeal judge and dismissed the appeal.

The appellant appealed an order dismissing its motion to set aside a judgment.

The Court of Appeal upheld the motion judge's finding that the appellant failed to bring its motion forthwith after the judgment came to its attention, noting the obligation was triggered almost a year before the motion was made.

The appeal was dismissed with costs.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the main appeal by British Aviation Insurance Group (Canada) Ltd., finding that the trial judge's findings were reasonably supported by the evidence.

Consequently, the respondent did not pursue its cross-appeal, which was also dismissed.

A concurrent appeal by McDonnell against the dismissal of an action against AOG was dismissed because it raised new issues not argued at trial and contradicted the evidence of its own representative.

All appeals were dismissed with costs.

The appellant challenged the registration of a Finnish judgment.

The Court of Appeal held there was no dispute that the appellant had been properly notified, when served with the default judgment, of the automatic right to a trial on the merits in the original proceedings and had failed to avail himself of that right.

Finding no error in the motion judge's decision to register the foreign judgment, the court dismissed the appeal with costs.