The applicant sought non-earner benefits following a motor vehicle accident.
The respondent denied the benefits based on insurer's examinations which concluded the applicant did not suffer a complete inability to carry on a normal life.
The Tribunal preferred the detailed reports of the respondent's assessors over the brief letter from the applicant's family physician.
The Tribunal found the applicant was able to continue his pre-accident activities and dismissed the claim for non-earner benefits, interest, and costs.
