The appellant appealed his 17-month custodial sentence for sexual interference, challenging both its length and the terms of a ten-year ancillary protection order.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal against the sentence length, finding no error in the sentencing judge's application of Gladue factors or the principle of restraint.
However, the court allowed the appeal in part by varying the ancillary order, striking an unlawful non-contact term and narrowing overly broad geographical and supervision restrictions.
