The applicant alleged discrimination on the basis of disability in employment following a workplace injury that resulted in a broken hip.
She claimed the respondent failed to accommodate her need for reduced hours, denied her a promotion, changed her compensation structure, and harassed her by monitoring her work activities.
The Tribunal found that the respondent had made genuine and ongoing efforts to accommodate the applicant, including offering a graduated return to work program and implementing ergonomic recommendations.
The Tribunal concluded that the applicant failed to provide necessary medical documentation to support her need for reduced hours and that the respondent's actions were reasonable and non-discriminatory.
The application was dismissed.
