The applicant sought a non-earner benefit following a motor vehicle accident.
The insurer denied the benefit on the basis that the applicant was employed and entitled to an income replacement benefit instead.
The applicant applied to the Tribunal more than two years after the denial.
The Tribunal found that the insurer's denial was clear, unequivocal, and contained the required dispute resolution information, thereby triggering the two-year limitation period under s. 56 of the Schedule.
The Tribunal declined to extend the limitation period under s. 7 of the LAT Act, finding significant delay and prejudice to the insurer.
The application was dismissed as statute-barred.