The appellant appealed a Small Claims Court decision dismissing her claim against the respondent brokerage for losses incurred during an online stock trade.
The appellant alleged the trial judge was biased against her as a self-represented litigant and made errors of fact and law.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding no evidence of bias, particularly as the appellant failed to provide a trial transcript.
The court also held that the trial judge made no palpable and overriding error in concluding the respondent was not liable for the appellant's failure to understand the trading platform or mitigate her losses.
