The moving party father brought a motion for unsupervised access to his two children, one of whom has significant autism spectrum disorder.
The responding party mother opposed the motion and sought to limit the father to supervised access, arguing he could not safely manage the child's needs.
After the motion was argued, both parties sought to introduce new evidence.
The court admitted some of the new evidence but excluded photographs.
The court found that the father could safely manage the child's needs and that unsupervised access was in the children's best interests, ordering a transition to unsupervised access.
