The appellant was convicted of trafficking cocaine contrary to s. 5(3)(a) of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act.
The Crown's case relied on evidence that the appellant sold nine ounces of cocaine to an intermediary, who subsequently sold it to an undercover officer.
The trial judge accepted the intermediary's testimony and found the appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
The trial judge also found that guilt could be independently established through police surveillance evidence.
The appellant appealed, challenging the trial judge's treatment of the intermediary's evidence, particularly regarding credibility assessment and reliance on demeanour.
The appeal was dismissed.
