In a judge-alone criminal trial involving allegations of sexual assault and related sexual offences against a 15-year-old complainant, the only live issue was whether the alleged sexual activity occurred.
Applying the W.D. framework, the court held that the accused's denial, supported in part by the spouse's evidence on a key alleged incident, raised a reasonable doubt.
The court found serious reliability concerns in the complainant's evidence, including material inconsistencies, an evidentiary gap surrounding the evolution of her allegations after treatment and discussions with others, and a significant contradiction concerning a specific alleged incident.
The Crown failed to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt, and the accused was acquitted.