The applicant employee applied to terminate the respondent union's bargaining rights at the first open period following a difficult strike and first collective agreement.
The union argued the employee petition was not voluntary due to the applicant's perceived proximity to management, the open gathering of signatures at the plant gates, and prior management statements.
The majority of the Board found the petition was a voluntary expression of employee wishes, noting the applicant was not in a supervisory role and the context of the recent strike diminished concerns about secrecy.
A representation vote was ordered.
One Board member dissented, finding the petition was tainted by management involvement and the overall environment.