The appellant appealed a motions judge's decision refusing to grant an adjournment, appoint an inspector, or invoke compliance and oppression remedies under the Condominium Act, 1998.
The Court of Appeal upheld the motions judge's exercise of discretion, noting that while the direct election of the president and prohibition of proxies were non-compliant, they were approved by the Board to address long-standing complaints.
The court also confirmed that an increase in common expenses in the annual budget does not require a by-law or compliance with s. 97(4) of the Act.
The appeal was dismissed.
