The parties brought cross-motions in a family law proceeding.
The self-represented applicant sought retroactive spousal support, interim disbursements, further disclosure, and leave to amend her application.
The respondent sought an order for the immediate sale of the matrimonial home and temporary exclusive possession.
The court permitted the applicant to amend her application but dismissed her other requests, noting inconsistencies in her positions regarding the respondent's pension and retroactive support.
The court also dismissed the respondent's motion for sale and exclusive possession, finding a sale would prejudice the applicant's claim for a vesting order.
Costs were awarded to the respondent.