The parties separated in 2006 and shared parenting of their 10-year-old child.
After the mother planned to relocate, the father obtained an interim without prejudice order for week-on/week-off shared custody and prohibiting the child's relocation.
The mother subsequently brought a motion to vary the interim order to implement the access recommendations of a newly released Office of the Children's Lawyer report, which recommended primary residence with the mother.
The court dismissed the motion, finding that the OCL report did not mandate immediate action and that maintaining the existing week-on/week-off arrangement provided stability and was in the child's best interests pending trial.
