The appellants were charged with conspiracy to commit extortion and related offences.
Following their committal, their trial was delayed for almost two years, primarily due to institutional problems and a lack of resources in the judicial district.
The appellants moved for a stay of proceedings, arguing their right to be tried within a reasonable time under s. 11(b) of the Charter had been infringed.
The Supreme Court of Canada held that the delay was clearly excessive and unreasonable, establishing a framework for assessing s. 11(b) claims that considers the length of delay, explanation for delay, waiver, and prejudice to the accused.
The appeal was allowed and a stay of proceedings was directed.