The parties, who separated in 1991 after a traditional marriage, both brought motions to change a 1993 spousal support order.
The moving party sought to terminate his $500 monthly spousal support obligation, citing his retirement, health issues, and the responding party's improved financial position.
The responding party brought a cross-motion seeking an increase in support due to inflation and ongoing economic disadvantage.
The court dismissed both motions, finding that neither party had met the threshold burden of establishing a material change in circumstances that would justify varying the existing order.
