The parties appealed and cross-appealed a trial judgment arising from the dissolution of their horse business relationship.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, finding the trial judge erred in awarding unjust enrichment for foal expenses, dismissing the claim for purse monies, overcompensating for a horse's reduced value, and denying damages from an interlocutory injunction.
The court also awarded the appellant solicitor and client costs based on a Rule 49 offer to settle.
The cross-appeal was allowed in part to grant the respondent pre-judgment interest.
