The appellant, a police superintendent, appealed a conviction for neglect of duty and the resulting penalty of a reprimand.
The charge arose from allegations that he failed to initiate an investigation after being informed by the widow of a murdered officer that two other officers were improperly absent from duty on the night of the murder.
The Commission found that the Hearing Officer's decision, which relied on the widow's testimony over the appellant's, was not void of evidentiary foundation.
The appeal against both the conviction and the penalty was dismissed.