The self-represented appellant appealed a trial judge's decision dismissing his claim for damages arising from a slip and fall on a wooden foot bridge at a golf course.
The trial judge had found that the respondent municipality met the standard of care, the bridge was reasonably safe, and the appellant had willingly assumed the risk under section 4 of the Occupiers' Liability Act.
The Divisional Court applied the standard of review for questions of mixed fact and law, concluding that the trial judge made no palpable and overriding error.
The appeal was dismissed.
