The plaintiff brought a motion to strike the defendant's civil jury notice, arguing that the COVID-19 pandemic would cause a delay of 12 to 18 months if the matter proceeded before a jury.
The defendant opposed the motion, advocating for a 'wait and see' approach.
The court granted the motion, finding that the delay caused by the pandemic outweighed the defendant's right to a jury trial, and that justice would be better served by allowing the 10-year-old action to proceed more expeditiously before a judge alone.