The respondent brought a motion for contempt against the applicant for refusing to share transportation for access visits as required by an order dated July 18, 2013.
The applicant brought a cross-motion to strike paragraph 12 of that order, claiming it had been included by mistake.
The court dismissed the contempt motion, finding the applicant had not wilfully disobeyed a court order, and granted the motion to strike the transportation provision.
The court also addressed a subsequent motion regarding the applicant's travel to Florida for American Thanksgiving, and considered whether costs should be awarded against respondent's counsel personally for failing to appear at the November 13 hearing.
