The plaintiff brought an action claiming $1,465,000 for consulting and management services allegedly provided to the defendants in connection with various real estate projects in Canada and Croatia.
The defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing there was no genuine issue for trial and that the claims were statute-barred.
The court granted the motion, finding no evidence of a syndicate or unpaid services, and that the plaintiff had been paid in full for the documented projects.
Furthermore, the court held that the action was statute-barred under the Limitations Act, 2002, as the business relationship ended in 2003 and the action was not commenced until 2010.
