The appellant appealed an order appointing his mother and sister as guardians of property and personal care for his incapable sister.
The appellant argued the application judge made unreasonable findings of fact, unfairly disregarded his evidence, and failed to consider the incapable sister's best interests.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding that the application judge's findings were supported by the evidence, including the finding that the appellant's actions were financially motivated.
The application judge properly scrutinized the management plans and concluded it was in the incapable sister's best interests to remain with her mother.
