Kristine Holder

The plaintiffs and the defendant were 50:50 co-owners of a social media marketing business.

Following a breakdown in their relationship, the defendant locked the plaintiffs out of the business's social media accounts, and the plaintiffs created a copycat account.

The plaintiffs brought a motion for interlocutory mandatory and restrictive injunctions, and the defendant brought a cross-motion for similar relief.

The court ordered the defendant to provide the plaintiffs with the account information and passwords, but otherwise dismissed both the motion and cross-motion, finding that neither party had clean hands and damages would be an adequate remedy.

The plaintiff sued the defendants for $78,600, alleging breach of an oral contract to provide immigration services to a third party.

The defendants counterclaimed for unpaid immigration services, an unpaid loan, and unpaid rent.

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claims, finding his evidence and that of his witnesses lacked credibility and documentary support.

The court also dismissed the defendant Depinderdeep Singh's counterclaims for lack of documentary evidence.

However, the court granted the defendant Monisha Singh's counterclaim for unpaid rent in the amount of $16,400, based on a written lease agreement.

The applicant sought a declaration that a bankrupt's notional gift of 50% equity in a matrimonial home to his spouse was a transfer at undervalue and void under s. 96(1)(b)(i) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act.

The court found that even if the transfer was at undervalue, it would exercise its equitable discretion not to declare it void.

The court considered factors such as the spouses' good faith, the lack of intention to defeat creditors, the spouse's non-monetary contributions to the family, and her need for the funds to support herself and her children.