The applicant sought various statutory accident benefits following a 2011 motor vehicle accident, including a costly rehabilitation program in British Columbia, attendant care benefits, a new vehicle, and other medical expenses.
The Licence Appeal Tribunal dismissed the application in its entirety.
The Tribunal found that the out-of-province rehabilitation program was not reasonable or necessary, as appropriate facilities were available in Ontario.
The claim for 24-hour supervisory attendant care was rejected because the supporting occupational therapy report was speculative and lacked credibility.
Claims for a new vehicle, physiotherapy, and float therapy were also denied for failing to consider alternatives, failing to submit prior treatment plans, and being experimental in nature.
No award or interest was granted.
