This endorsement addresses compliance with a previous court order regarding rent payments and premises vacation.
The applicant alleged the respondent breached the order by contacting subtenants and sought an injunction.
The respondent claimed the applicant owed additional rent and credited subtenant payments received.
The court reaffirmed the terms of the prior endorsement, requiring the applicant to pay rent as due (less subtenant payments received by the respondent) and stating that failure to pay would release the respondent from their undertaking not to remove the applicant.
The court declined to hear the injunction request due to the lack of a formal motion and factum, noting potential issues with establishing irreparable harm.
Costs were reserved.
