The applicant was involved in a motor vehicle accident and sought statutory accident benefits.
The respondent denied benefits, arguing the applicant's injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).
The Tribunal found that the applicant sustained a psychological impairment, specifically post-traumatic stress disorder and vehicular anxiety, which removed him from the MIG.
The Tribunal preferred the evidence of the applicant's psychologist over the respondent's assessor.
The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay for the disputed psychological assessment, psychological services, and chiropractic services, along with interest on overdue benefits.
